# Source note — Carney/Joly online-information bills YouTube source-check

Date captured: 2026-07-07

## YouTube source
- URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiTtzwo0pJM
- Title: Carney Wants to IMPRISON Canadians For Doing This… A SECRET Memo Reveals
- Channel: The Right Call – with Elliot Daigneault
- Upload date: 20260706
- Duration: 1413 seconds

## Key transcript passages
- 1:02–1:36: The video says a heavily redacted 35-page draft memo from Industry Minister Mélanie Joly's department calls for preventing, detecting and responding to false information on platforms such as Facebook, X and LinkedIn, including potential legal actions, then links that to Bill C-8, C-9, C-11, C-12, C-22 and C-34.
- 10:54–11:40: The video discusses AI/data/privacy/children, then claims Bill C-22 would put encryption at risk and that online ID/account rules could be used with Bill C-9 hate-speech enforcement and misinformation-related legal action.

## Official bill checks captured from Parliament of Canada / LEGISinfo
- Bill C-8 (45-1): An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts; received royal assent June 15, 2026.
- Bill C-9 (45-1): Combatting Hate Act; amends the Criminal Code on hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places; received royal assent June 18, 2026.
- Bill C-11 (45-1): Military Justice System Modernization Act; received royal assent June 18, 2026. This is not an online-speech bill based on the Parliament title/summary page.
- Bill C-12 (45-1): Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act; received royal assent March 26, 2026. This is not an online-speech bill based on the Parliament title/summary page.
- Bill C-22 (45-1): Lawful Access Act, 2026; House of Commons third reading June 18, 2026, awaiting first reading in the Senate at capture time.
- Bill C-34 (45-1): Safe Social Media Act; introduced June 10, 2026 and at second reading in the House of Commons at capture time.

## Editorial handling
The article attributes the strongest memo/legal-action claim to the YouTube video because the publicly accessible source trail captured here did not include the underlying 35-page memo. The article separates official Parliament facts from commentary and unverified linkage claims.