0:00 If you already have a shortage of
0:01 something and you add 20 million people
0:03 who are trying to get that something,
0:06 you're going to have a problem.
0:07 >> I guess what I'm asking for is
0:08 >> So today is bombshell after bombshell
0:11 coming out. First, a US Federal Reserve
0:13 paper that finally exposes the reason
0:15 why we all feel like we can't afford
0:18 life anymore. And the reason behind it
0:20 is so ridiculously insidious and has
0:22 been happening all over Canada, the US,
0:25 and all of Europe. So the question
0:27 becomes, who has been ordering this
0:29 catastrophe upon us? Then another
0:32 bombshell report showing that the
0:33 Canadian government is gearing up for
0:35 war with its citizens over what
0:38 information they are allowed to share.
0:40 It's all much worse than you could ever
0:43 imagine. My name is Ellie Daniel and
0:44 this is the right call. Like, share,
0:46 subscribe, hype this video up. Any
0:48 interaction on this channel helps push
0:50 the truth out and maybe someday help
0:52 break that CBC induced coma that so many
0:54 Canadians are under. And if you haven't
0:56 already, smash that subscribe button
0:57 because if you like the truth, you found
0:59 the right place. So stick around because
1:01 you don't want to miss this one today.
1:02 So a heavily redacted 35page draft memo
1:06 from industry minister Milani's
1:08 department calls for preventing,
1:10 detecting, and responding to false
1:12 information on platforms like Facebook,
1:15 X, and LinkedIn, including potential
1:18 legal actions. as long as you get senior
1:20 personnel approval. Effectively, the
1:22 Canadian government is gearing up for
1:24 war over information with its own
1:27 citizens. So now, Bill C8, Bill C9, Bill
1:31 C11, Bill C12, Bill C22, and Bill C34
1:36 all make sense. This is turning into
1:39 total warfare over your minds. The
1:42 Canadian people are not to be trusted,
1:44 forming their own thoughts and opinions.
1:46 No, this is only for CBC and CTV to
1:49 dictate. And if you use any online
1:51 platform and listen to any independent
1:53 voices, they are not to be trusted and
1:55 you must be controlled. So, who's going
1:57 to define misinformation? Will the
1:59 government become the arbiter of truth?
2:01 Is a ministry of truth going to be a new
2:03 department that our government creates?
2:05 Will we start seeing notices like these
2:07 on my posts and all other creators posts
2:10 that have not been approved by the
2:11 Ministry of Truth? This is beyond
2:14 dangerous and not the path of a free
2:16 society. I'm a freedom of speech
2:17 absolutist. But if we look at Canada,
2:20 freedom of expression already carries
2:21 responsibilities. Deliberate fraud,
2:24 threats, and incitement already have
2:26 consequences under Canadian law. But
2:28 empowering governments to determine what
2:30 ideas, opinions, and information may be
2:32 shared risks undermining the very
2:35 freedom it insists it's protecting. And
2:38 it's something we've all been warning
2:39 you about and it's finally happening.
2:42 God, I wish it wasn't. I'm not glad
2:44 about this at all.
2:44 >> I would ask if you know how much housing
2:47 costs went up during the Biden years.
2:49 >> It went up significantly, but why add
2:51 why add to them by adding tariffs in the
2:54 last year raising tariffs?
2:56 >> And you're talking about due to interest
2:57 rates. You mean like buying a home? Is
2:59 that what you're talking about?
2:59 >> Yes. Prices of housing went up 20 30%
3:02 during the four years that Joe Biden was
3:04 in. some of the arguments we're having
3:05 about housing in the United States and
3:07 how expensive it is, the bulk of it came
3:09 while Biden was president. What Scott
3:10 Besson is saying is objectively true. We
3:13 do have a housing shortage in this
3:15 country. So we we already have too few
3:17 doiciles for the people who are here.
3:19 His point was simply that if you put 10
3:21 or 20 million new people into the pool,
3:23 whether they're illegal or not, that is
3:25 going to increase competition for the
3:27 already short supply. If you already
3:29 have a shortage of something and you add
3:31 20 million people who are trying to get
3:33 that somethingarily,
3:35 you're going to have a problem.
3:36 >> I guess what I'm asking for is actual
3:37 proof of that being there's no
3:39 correlation between economic principles
3:41 but I think people trying to buy fewer
3:44 commodities. Listen, I'm asking you is
3:46 there proof that what you are saying
3:47 actually happened because the the
3:49 because the immigrants came were what
3:52 they were
3:54 that actually is actually right on the
3:56 50,000 point view. I think 50,000 foot
3:58 view.
3:59 >> God, how did these people end up on TV?
4:01 That bickering. What the hell? Debate
4:03 the point instead of just cackling over
4:05 them. But anyways, she says she wants
4:06 proof. Well, proof she will get because
4:09 Biden's illegal immigration surge
4:11 triggered 30% rise in home prices and
4:14 20% in rent. According to a Federal
4:16 Reserve paper that was just released,
4:18 economists from the Dallas and San
4:20 Francisco Federal Reserve Banks analyzed
4:22 data from 2021 and 2024 and found that
4:25 unauthorized immigration accounted for
4:27 30% of home price growths and 20% of
4:31 rent growth in a typical US metro area.
4:34 But here's where it gets damning. A 1%
4:36 increase in unauthorized workers
4:38 relative to a local labor force
4:40 corresponded with roughly a 1% increase
4:42 in overall employment with no evidence
4:44 that immigration surge reduced average
4:46 wages. The same 1% increase, however,
4:48 was associated with a roughly 2.2% rise
4:52 in home prices and a 1.4% rise in rents.
4:55 This, by the way, is in contradiction
4:57 with a Bank of Canada report that says
4:59 that mass migration actually suppressed
5:02 low-skill wages by up to 10%. I
5:05 personally think it's much higher than
5:06 10%. They're just trying to not, you
5:07 know, break the narrative too much for
5:08 the Carne Liberals. However, Bank of
5:11 Canada found that mass migration does
5:12 suppress wages. This Federal Reserve
5:14 paper found that it did not suppress
5:15 wages. However, it did create a massive
5:19 inflation on housing costs. Something
5:21 that again normal folks have been
5:23 knowing, have been calling out for, have
5:25 been reporting for years. We eliminated
5:28 non-permanent residents el el el el el
5:29 el el el el el el el el el el el el el
5:29 el el eligibility for fains insured
5:31 mortgages and we are auditing public
5:33 housing authorities to ensure taxpayer
5:35 dollars don't support illegal aliens.
5:37 American dollars should benefit American
5:39 citizens and American citizens only by
5:41 focusing on our core mission. HUD
5:43 provided a pathway for home ownership
5:45 and supported housing affordability for
5:47 more than 1 million Americans through
5:48 FHA and Genie Mate. We also take
5:51 stewardship very seriously. So we're
5:52 cracking down on waste and fraud and
5:54 abuse. Our office of the chief financial
5:56 officer uncovered more than $5 billion
5:58 in potential payment errors over 50
6:00 billion in total rental assistance for
6:02 the fiscal year 2024. And that includes
6:04 money that went to nearly 30,000 dead
6:07 people. That is ludicrous. It's
6:09 ridiculous to even think or talk in such
6:10 a way. It's a violation of our sacred
6:13 trust to American taxpayers and it has
6:15 to end and it will.
6:16 >> So now you understand why President
6:18 Trump has been blocking mortgages and
6:20 housing assistance to illegals and why
6:23 do Democrats keep calling for more? Why
6:24 do they push this upon their people?
6:26 It's almost like they hate the people
6:28 they're supposed to represent. And I'm
6:29 going to call this for what it really
6:30 is, the betrayal of a lifetime. And the
6:34 media should be talking about this 24/7.
6:37 But it extends even more than just
6:38 illegal immigration because Americans
6:41 can't get mortgages because they don't
6:43 have the right credit score. But an H1B
6:45 visa holder can come over and
6:47 immediately get approved. Do you get it?
6:51 This is not about benefiting the local
6:53 domestic population. It's in order to
6:56 displace you, replace you, demoralize
6:59 you. I don't know. Someone's calling the
7:01 shots behind this because this is
7:02 happening in Canada. We'll talk about
7:03 that in a second. This is happening all
7:05 over Europe. It's happening in the US.
7:07 Who's pushing for this? Side note, an H-
7:08 H1B visa is a work visa in Canada. So,
7:11 now compare and contrast the same but
7:13 with Canada. According to StatCan,
7:15 Canada has a 1.5% annual newcomer rate.
7:19 That means 1.5% of our population grows
7:22 every year due to migration from outside
7:25 the country coming in. This by the way
7:27 tops the G7 countries and if that's not
7:29 bad enough the 34 OECD countries.
7:32 Further in 2021 8.3 million people or
7:36 23%
7:38 of our population was landed immigrants
7:41 or permanent residents, the highest in
7:44 our entire history. So, how much did
7:47 immigration contribute to our
7:49 unaffordable cost of living? How much
7:51 did immigration rob millennials, which
7:53 is my generation, Gen Z's, which is
7:55 younger than me, and Gen Alpha, which is
7:57 my son's generation, from home ownership
7:59 and the ability to start a family. The
8:02 reality is that it doesn't have to be
8:04 this way. The only reason why we are
8:06 bringing in more people than we should
8:08 is because the economy is stagnating due
8:10 to piss poor policy. The only way to
8:13 artificially boost the economic numbers
8:15 is through mass migration, but it comes
8:17 at a tremendous cost. There's also the
8:19 fact that we have some of the world's
8:20 most gracious social programs and
8:22 entitlements, which sadly were poorly
8:24 funded at the time. I'm not going to
8:26 make friends with the people from the
8:28 boomer generation watching this. This is
8:30 just purely mathematics. But a lot of
8:32 the programs that you did pay into it,
8:33 and you did, and you contributed heavily
8:36 to it, but were underfunded. So now the
8:38 younger generation has to pick up a tab
8:41 that is even bigger to ensure that your
8:43 programs like OAS is still funded.
8:46 Healthcare is the same. But the problem
8:47 is this. We have to contribute even more
8:50 than you did. While the programs are
8:52 actually stagnating and declining in
8:53 quality of service, which I'm sure you
8:55 realize and feel we all do. But there's
8:57 somewhere along the line that it's
8:58 broken. It was underfunded. We can't go
9:00 back in time and fix it. So now we're
9:02 stuck between a rock and a hard place.
9:04 Either programs have to be cut or mass
9:06 migration has to continue to somehow
9:08 profit. But it comes with untold
9:10 destruction for the culture of Canada,
9:13 social cohesion of Canada, and the
9:15 well-being, the financial well-being of
9:16 the future generation. But actually,
9:18 there is a third way, and this is the
9:19 way we never talk about, and I purposely
9:21 waited till the last second to mention
9:23 it because it's too easy to point
9:24 fingers at each other. Everyone's going
9:26 to hate each other. It's the divide and
9:28 conquer principle. I'm not against the
9:30 boomers, and boomers shouldn't be
9:31 against millennials. Rather, we should
9:33 both collectively set our sights on
9:36 government efficiency. Because the third
9:39 way we can solve this issue is by
9:41 ensuring maximum efficiency the way a
9:45 private company like SpaceX would do.
9:47 There is no reason why we keep sinking
9:49 more money into services and yet get
9:52 poor results. There is no reason why 20
9:54 upwards of 20% of our population works
9:57 for the public sector. You're not going
9:59 to tell me it's productive individuals
10:01 doing this. positions are clearly
10:03 duplicates or even worse three or four
10:05 people doing the same job. If we
10:07 increase efficiency of our government,
10:09 then the economic output through mass
10:11 migration doesn't have to rise to the
10:13 same level and programs and entitlements
10:16 don't have to be cut. That is the first
10:18 avenue we should all be calling for,
10:21 attacking, tackling, and putting all of
10:22 our collective brain power into. We will
10:24 accelerate investments in energy and
10:26 transportation infrastructure to create
10:28 jobs, strengthen our sovereignty, and
10:30 share prosperity across current and
10:32 future generations.
10:34 >> When does that start? Because you've
10:35 been in government for over a year. You
10:36 said that you would build at speeds
10:37 unseen in Canadian in Canian history,
10:39 and it has yet to build anything. You've
10:41 built nothing. Nothing has been built.
10:43 Just announcements, announcements about
10:47 no concrete results. We've been losing
10:49 jobs. There's been less prosperity. and
10:51 generations of Canadians are tearing at
10:54 the seams.
10:54 >> We'll help Canadians harness the
10:56 potential of AI while protecting your
10:59 data, your privacy, and your kids.
11:01 >> That is the most ironic and downright
11:03 psychopathic thing he's ever said. Did I
11:06 just name all the bills before? Bill
11:07 C22, your data. Really? You want to
11:09 protect our data while putting
11:10 encryption at risk, forcing companies to
11:12 create back doors so your government can
11:14 spy on us? And by the way, if you can
11:15 spy on us, that means hackers can spy on
11:17 us. You want to protect our kids? No.
11:20 You want to ensure that everyone uploads
11:22 their ID to be able to access services
11:25 online so that you know who they are so
11:27 that they cannot use anonymous accounts
11:28 so that then you can enforce your bill
11:31 C9 about hate speech and you know
11:33 apparently with Minister Milani Jolie um
11:36 misinformation arresting taking legal
11:39 actions against you. Okay, sure. Wow,
11:41 the gaslighting is intense. We will
11:43 strengthen our partnerships abroad to
11:44 open new market places and to bolster
11:47 our independence.
11:48 >> Except if those markets are the American
11:50 market that we will not strengthen.
11:53 Instead, we'll undermine at every turn
11:55 and just piss them off and then run away
11:57 with our tail between our legs when our
11:59 economy collapses. And we will remain
12:01 laser focused on improving affordability
12:05 and on ensuring that all Canadians share
12:08 in the benefits of a Canada is not just
12:11 strong but good.
12:12 >> This is just too funny. Affordability. I
12:14 don't even have to make a comment.
12:15 Affordability. Do you feel like things
12:17 are affordable? Have things gone more
12:19 affordable? It's been 11 years of things
12:21 getting less affordable under this
12:23 government.
12:26 How can you How can you look I would
12:27 die. I would die if I looked at the
12:29 camera every day and just flat out lie.
12:31 I get some things wrong sometimes and
12:32 then I try to create corrections or I
12:34 try to mention it or I'll be in the
12:36 comments, by the way, on YouTube and if
12:37 someone points something out wrong, I'll
12:38 be like, "Hey, thank you for that. This
12:40 guy's looking straight at us in the
12:41 camera lying." Just flat out lying with
12:43 a straight face. We call that a
12:45 psychopath
12:45 >> because we are building Canada strong
12:48 for all of the time.
12:50 >> And that's just a slogan. So, while
12:51 Canadians are getting gas lit by their
12:53 government, America is instituting and
12:55 launching today the Trump account. Not a
12:58 big fan of the name. I think they could
12:59 have found something a little bit
13:00 better, but you know, it's Trump and
13:01 branding. But what is the Trump
13:02 accounts?
13:03 >> But if parents have not done so already,
13:06 and they are doing so in record numbers,
13:08 they should go right away to
13:10 trumpacounts.gov and sign their child up
13:13 for a free investment savings account.
13:14 And again, a lot of people are uh people
13:16 that are uninvolved in terms of they
13:18 don't have the children, but uh or their
13:20 children are older, but they're putting
13:23 millions and millions of dollars into
13:24 the accounts of poor children,
13:26 financially poor children. And uh the
13:30 parents can't even believe what's
13:31 happening. So, it's it's an amazing
13:33 thing. But parents, loved ones,
13:35 churches, and generous companies and
13:37 individuals will be able to contribute
13:39 funds to these accounts to grow
13:41 throughout the child's life. And again,
13:43 if we have a good market like we do now,
13:45 they're going to become actually very
13:48 rich. They'll have hundreds of thousands
13:50 of dollars. Think of that. Think of it.
13:52 A child that has no money can have
13:55 hundreds of thousands of dollars at a
13:58 very, very young age. Accounts could
14:00 grow to be worth numbers that nobody
14:03 ever thought even possible. So, the
14:05 Trump account will give $1,000 to every
14:08 American child born between January 1st,
14:11 2025 and December 31st, 2028. This
14:14 account is fully in the child's name,
14:17 and the parent is the sole custodian
14:19 until the kid turns 18. So, the parents
14:21 can let that 1,000 free dollar that was
14:23 seated in there just on its own to grow
14:25 until the child turns 18. Or the parents
14:27 can also contribute up to $5,000 per
14:30 year to maximize the growth. Now, the
14:31 money in the account is invested
14:33 automatically into American
14:35 corporations. In a way, it mirrors and
14:37 mimics the Canadian RESP, the registered
14:41 education savings plan. However, it does
14:43 things a little bit different. While in
14:44 Canada, not every child receives one.
14:46 Rather, it's the prerogative of the
14:47 parents to open one and to fund it.
14:49 Governments do match and contribute to
14:51 some amount into it. So, for example,
14:53 Canada contributes, I think, 20 or 30%
14:55 match up to a certain amount. And
14:56 Quebec, where I'm from, also contributes
14:58 10 or 15% match up to some amount as
15:02 well. Uh I don't think other provinces
15:03 do. I think it's just Quebec that also
15:05 bonafies all our taxes coming back to
15:07 us. Yeah. But with the Trump account,
15:08 they're taking it a step further.
15:10 Rather, what they're doing is they're
15:11 seeding all the accounts with $1,000,
15:13 which means that even if the parents are
15:15 dirt poor, completely broke, the child
15:17 will have money. It doesn't require
15:18 parents to put money aside because to
15:20 have the government match money, well,
15:21 you need to have money first to put into
15:23 it. And I think that is also a wonderful
15:25 initiative to promote domestic birth
15:27 rates. If every kid born between 2025
15:30 and 2028 receives a $3,000 that will
15:33 grow and compound over time, that is
15:35 amazing. It also puts a lot of faith and
15:36 trust into the American economy because
15:38 the money is only invested in American
15:40 companies and it also creates liquidity
15:42 in a way for American corporation. Now,
15:44 there's obviously a risk. It needs to be
15:45 mentioned. The risk is that the money is
15:47 appropriated in shady ways by the
15:49 federal government to be given in shady
15:51 ways to some friends that own American
15:53 companies. That I might have an issue
15:54 that I have an issue. I have an issue
15:56 with. I'm not saying this is what's
15:57 happening, but it could happen. However,
15:58 I think the idea and the exe execution
16:00 behind it is is impeccable. It's
16:01 incredible and I think it is better than
16:03 the Canadian registered education
16:05 savings plan here in uh Canada. So, good
16:08 on the Trump admin. And Canada, maybe we
16:10 should take notice and start doing the
16:12 same to promote birth rates here. That'd
16:13 be great. Another thing that we should
16:15 do though is promote a private
16:16 investment into our infrastructure.
16:18 However, it seems to be a little bit
16:20 hard right now.
16:21 >> Premier Smith, the Southboy South
16:23 pipeline to the US is fully subscribed.
16:25 It has signed contracts with so many oil
16:26 producers it will be full for the next
16:28 20 years. The Carneu pipeline project
16:30 has no customers signed up. Isn't it
16:32 obvious that no one in the industry
16:34 actually believes this is going to be
16:35 built? Certainly not enough to put their
16:36 own money into it.
16:38 >> Well, thanks for the nice neutral
16:39 question.
16:40 >> I mean, she's got a point right there.
16:42 typical liberal media with their leading
16:45 questions that are more like statements
16:46 in order to, you know, get a gotcha
16:48 moment than anything. But anyways, let's
16:50 listen to what she says because I don't
16:51 agree with Premier Smith there at all.
16:53 Actually, I think she makes a horrible
16:55 case for private investment by mistake.
16:57 >> Um, I I would say it's a bit premature
17:00 to to make that point. Um, I think that
17:02 what we've done with our West Coast
17:04 pipeline is announced an intention for
17:05 the federal and provincial government to
17:07 work together. We've got a private
17:08 proponent. We have to make sure that we
17:09 can get all of the uh indigenous
17:12 consultation and ownership stake, make
17:13 sure that we do the environmental
17:15 approvals and I have absolutely
17:17 >> so thank you for mentioning two reasons
17:19 why private investment might be scared
17:21 off from you know putting their money
17:22 into a project in Canada
17:24 >> confidence with the conversations that
17:25 we've been having with the pathways
17:27 group that we will get those
17:28 commitments. Remember you can start a
17:29 pipeline um with a smaller amount going
17:32 through it and then you can do
17:32 compression just like we're seeing with
17:34 the Trans Mountain pipeline. They began
17:36 with a little bit of a a smaller volume,
17:38 but they're also increasing now up to
17:40 300,000 barrels. I think it's our job to
17:42 make sure that we can expand the
17:44 industry by 2 million barrels. So, not
17:46 only can we fill the South B line, we
17:47 can still fill the West Coast line, we
17:49 can build uh fill our our our new uh
17:51 Northern What were you calling yours?
17:53 North
17:54 >> Northern Shield.
17:55 >> Northern Shield.
17:56 >> I mean, it's right there on your podium.
17:58 That's not really a good look. Should
17:59 have been prepped a little bit more. I
18:00 love Danielle Smith, by the I think
18:01 she's an amazing premier, but that
18:04 wasn't the finest moment. I think she
18:06 might be a little too uh hung over from
18:08 the stampede. I don't know. I know she
18:10 was at the stampede partying and it
18:12 looked like a riot over there.
18:13 >> Our new Northern Shield pipeline uh and
18:15 uh and and also um be able to serve
18:18 north,southeast, west. I mean, this is
18:20 the the whole point of what we were
18:21 trying to do in building out economic
18:22 corridors. So, I think it's a a great
18:24 project. You have to remember a few
18:25 years ago we were talking about projects
18:27 in all direction. We're talking about
18:28 Northern Gateway, Keystone, and Energy
18:30 East. And for various reasons for each
18:31 of them, because regulatory uncertainty
18:34 um or because of permits being
18:35 cancelled, they ended up all stalling.
18:37 So this is
18:38 >> There you go. That's what I mean. Again,
18:39 you're making a case why private
18:42 investment shouldn't come to Canada and
18:44 invest in a new pipeline. You're not
18:45 helping here.
18:46 >> Resurrecting all three of those concepts
18:48 uh perhaps on different corridors with
18:50 some different partners. But I feel like
18:51 the industry was there 10 years ago,
18:53 they can be there again. Because if your
18:54 goal was to scare off an investment by
18:56 saying that it's complicated in Canada,
18:57 requires a lot of consultations, lots of
18:59 approval, lots of studies, and on top of
19:01 that, projects get cancelled last
19:02 seconds for myriad of reasons. Well,
19:04 yeah, private investment is not going to
19:05 want to come. They want to put their
19:06 money in and get results fast so that
19:09 money can start flowing in. And that's
19:10 not what she said right there. So, that
19:12 does not inspire confidence whatsoever.
19:13 And as much as I hate the journalist
19:15 because it was a loaded question, but I
19:16 mean, the journalist is right. American
19:18 projects are always fully subscribed,
19:20 aka they always raise all the money they
19:22 want. Sometimes they even oversubscribe.
19:23 But Canadian projects are hardly ever
19:25 subscribed. As a matter of fact, the
19:27 only way private investment comes in is
19:28 if they get support from the government.
19:30 And that's not okay. We should not be
19:33 subsidizing with taxpayer dollars
19:35 projects because our regulatory burden
19:38 and our economic environment is just so
19:39 piss poor that no one wants to put their
19:41 money here. We should fix the causes
19:43 first. We should fix all the reasons why
19:45 money doesn't want to flow in and then
19:46 money will flow in. Just let it come in.
19:48 Get out of the way. That's not what
19:50 governments love to do. But nonetheless,
19:51 here I thought about it. Let's highlight
19:53 just a few key factors of why private
19:54 companies don't want to come to Canada.
19:56 Regulatory uncertainty, lengthy
19:58 permitting, legal challenges, indigenous
20:00 consultation requirements, political
20:03 risk, carbon and climate policy. Wait,
20:05 we'll touch on that in a sec.
20:06 Cancellation precedents. Yeah, there you
20:08 go. We always cancel our projects, cost
20:11 overruns. We can never stick within the
20:13 costs. Inflation, financing cost,
20:16 insurance, insurance cost, ESG pressure.
20:19 You know what that is? That's
20:20 environmental sustainability and green
20:22 BS pressure. Reputation risk. Demand
20:25 uncertainty. Competition from the US,
20:27 which is just a better economic
20:29 environment to be in. Existing export
20:31 capacity. We're just a small economy
20:33 after all. Government intervention risk.
20:35 Yes, governments always get involved. We
20:37 don't want that in a private sector.
20:38 Provincial and federal disputes.
20:40 Municipal opposition. Environmental
20:42 opposition. Labor shortages. Supply
20:44 chain issues. Currency val fluctuation
20:46 and probably devaluation. indigenous
20:49 equity expectation and the opportunity
20:51 cost. If all those reasons before that
20:53 are not a good enough reason to not put
20:55 your money in Canada, well, the
20:56 opportunity cost, knowing that that
20:57 money could serve you better somewhere
20:58 else and grow so much faster is. And
21:00 speaking about carbon and ESG
21:02 regulations, see the top 10 producers by
21:05 output of oil, crude oil in the world,
21:08 Canada, the US, Russia, Saudi Arabia,
21:10 China, Iraq, Iran, the United Arab
21:12 Emirates, Brazil, and Kuwait. They all
21:15 share something in common that Canada
21:17 doesn't have. Just like find the outlier
21:18 here. What does Canada do that all the
21:20 others don't do? Well, they don't have
21:23 an industrial carbon price, whether it's
21:25 at the federal or provincial level
21:27 embedded within their production costs.
21:30 We do, which makes it uncompetitive on
21:33 such a large scale. Now, one thing I
21:34 have to say though is that for the first
21:36 time, I think in Canadian history, there
21:38 is more and more support for pipelines
21:39 in the country than people who oppose
21:42 it. Every province in Canada supports
21:43 pipeline and a greater majority than
21:46 people who don't support it. 67% of
21:48 people in Canada support it versus 24%
21:50 for people who do not. The province with
21:53 the highest support is obviously Alberta
21:55 and the one with the lowest as usual.
21:58 Hello, this is me Quebec. But I think
22:01 this is a symptom, a sign of all the
22:03 economic problems in Canada because
22:05 Canada is famous for being very anti
22:06 pipeline for some reason. Don't ask me
22:07 why. I think it's dumb. However, right
22:09 now, people are so pinched and our
22:11 economy is so stagnant that people are
22:13 willing to put aside their green
22:14 ideologies that have been sold in order
22:16 to make a couple dollars. And this goes
22:18 back to what I've always said, green is
22:21 only cool as long as you can afford food
22:23 on your table. The first thing to take
22:26 the door, to take the window, to take
22:28 the curb is your green ideology when you
22:31 can't afford shelter, food, or just
22:34 living life, man. So, I'm glad to see
22:36 the trend changing. Maybe we can finally
22:38 put behind us this dark moment in our
22:41 history. Now, if you've enjoyed this
22:42 report and would like to find a way to
22:43 get yourself involved with the channel,
22:44 aside from liking, sharing, hyping,
22:46 commenting, subbing, all the good stuff,
22:48 would greatly appreciate it. If you want
22:49 to take a step further and get yourself
22:51 involved financially, I have a Patreon.
22:53 It's $8 a month and it allows you to
22:54 financially support the channel every
22:56 month. If you rather just do a onetime
22:58 donation, no matter what the amount, if
22:59 it's a fair coffee or to get me a first
23:02 class ticket down to Zimbabwe for some
23:04 reason, I don't know, just first word
23:05 that came to my mind, then I also have a
23:07 PayPal link. Uh, don't break the bank
23:09 for that and also don't go to the food
23:11 bank for that, but any help is greatly
23:14 appreciated. Now, if you haven't seen
23:15 last report, I break down what's going
23:17 on with the trade deal with the US and
23:19 also some really weird, sadly kind of
23:22 outrageous videos that came out from the
23:24 Canada Day celebration. So, click right
23:26 here. You got to watch it.