# Claim table — Allison Inquiry / covidtestimony.com

| Claim / issue | Evidence label | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| covidtestimony.com is promoting the Allison Inquiry. | Confirmed. | Site captured; media/about/rules pages preserved. |
| Hearings are scheduled for Sept. 8–11, 2026. | Confirmed as organizer/site claim; reported externally. | Site, media page, CTV/CBC/CPAC context support the dates. |
| The hearings are live from Parliament Hill in Ottawa. | Confirmed as organizer/site claim; reported externally. | CTV says four days of testimony on Parliament Hill; CPAC has Aug. 13 press conference page. |
| Dean Allison is chair. | Confirmed. | Site/rules identify MP Dean Allison as chairperson. |
| The inquiry is non-partisan. | Organizer claim. | Site/rules state non-partisan; critics dispute whether the process is politically balanced. Attribute rather than state as settled fact. |
| It is an official government public inquiry or House committee. | Not established. | CTV says it is not sanctioned by the federal government and lacks official probe powers. Rules call it a preliminary inquiry/listening forum. |
| The inquiry will make findings of fact or medical causality findings. | Not supported. | Rules say it is not to make findings of fact or reach conclusions. |
| Vaccine injury exists as a recognized Canadian program category. | Confirmed with medical-assessment caveat. | PHAC’s VIAP/VISP exists for serious and permanent injuries assessed as likely caused by a Health Canada-authorized vaccine. |
| 3,557 VISP claims and 252 Medical Review Board approvals were reported by PHAC. | Confirmed. | PHAC statistics snapshot covers June 1, 2021 to Nov. 30, 2025; categories may overlap. |
| Every person testifying was vaccine-injured as a proven medical fact. | Not verified by this package. | Testimony may be sincere and important; diagnosis/causality require medical records and assessment. |
| Serious vaccine side effects are common. | Not supported by official safety framing. | Canada’s official pages describe serious reactions as rare while recognizing rare adverse events and compensation cases. |
| Canada should conduct a broader COVID response review. | Supported as a public-policy argument with mainstream context. | CBC quotes chief science adviser Mona Nemer supporting evidence-informed reflection; that is not the same as endorsing every claim made by the Allison Inquiry. |